Article

  0   0
: No likes yet...

Snapchat IPO vs Google's IPO vs Facebook's IPO




Snapchat is likely to come public in the next few months. I'll have to wait to get some insights from their filings to go public about their model and strategies, growth rates, etc before I can really analyze  Snapchat. I will let you guys know every bit of analysis I do on Snapchat as it comes public. If I had to guess, I'd probably be a buyer of $SNAP when it comes public if it's valuation is actually around $25 billion. Unfortunately, I expect that the hype around the IPO could take the first day's valuation to $50 or $60 billion.

That said, I sure like Snapchat as a pureplay on the continuing App Revolution. Snapchat and Instagram and to a smaller extent, Twitter, have displaced Facebook for most people under the age of 30. Snapchat is king for kids under the age of 20. More important to investors though, the way you use Snapchat and the way you consume content on Snapchat is making it a platform for video that has immense potential to disrupt cable TV, YouTube and perhaps even Netflix in years ahead. Why?

Snapchat has become its own de facto platform for advertisers and media companies because the app makes you consume media-rich Stories on Snapchat -- and it's just so quick and easy to swipe forward, back, up and down.

The key difference between Snapchat and the other social networks is that it's never has been and still isn't a web company. You can't go to Snapchat.com to see someone's profile or their stories. Go to Snapchat.com and you'll learn that "On any given day, Snapchat reaches 41% of all 18 to 34 year-olds in the United States. Source: Snapchat.com, Nielsen Media Impact, Reach Duplication, Nielsen Total Media Fusion/GfK MRI Survey of The American Consumer 9/1/2015 – 9/30/2015 (Television, Internet, and Mobile)."

Snapchat was built as an app company first and foremost. And unlike Facebook, Twitter or Instagram, all Snapchat content lives only in app form. It's truly an App Revolution company.

Here's an article from CBNC about an analyst's projections that "We are at the tail end of the social media boom. Novelty is giving way to fatigue," and that Snapchat won't be worth $1 billion when it's all said and done. That kind of pessimism made me think of this Trading With Cody report I wrote after we bought Facebook soon after it crashed in the immediate weeks right after its IPO:

Google’s past illuminates Facebook’s future

June 27, 2012 By Cody Willard

Anyway, let's talk Facebook for again this morning and I've got some great historical perspective for you. I bought Google the day it came public and I held it for the next four years until I closed my hedge fund to become a news anchor on national TV. The stock popped 20% its first day and then languished and faded for a few weeks after as Wall Street tried to get its arms around Google's business model. My analysis told me that Google was revolutionizing its industry -- simple search -- and was about to figure out new ways to use that Google platform to lock in users and create what I used to call "a burgeoning super-Internet called GoogleNet". With Gmail and YouTube and all the other daily applications that hundreds of millions of people now use every day, having some understanding and vision of how networks scale and how platforms create their own eco-systems was frankly pretty darn prescient.

I remember a couple weeks after Google came public that Barron's ran a cover article on how Google was doomed to fail and it quoted a couple analysts who said that they'd be interested in buying Google when it was at $20 a share. The stock was at $100 or so at the time. It never went below $100 again.

Google was a huge home run for me and my subscribers as the stock was up more than 500% from where I'd bought it and told my subscribers to do the same.

After Google came public, the analysts started issuing their research reports and opinions about the stock. Here's a sample of what they were saying at the time:

Google has made a point of not offering financial guidance to investors, which makes earnings forecasting difficult. Not surprisingly, analysts are mixed when it comes to Google. Ratings and target prices are all over the map with no apparent consensus. Caris rates Google at "average" with a $95 target price; Janco Partners has a "sell" rating and $76 target; Jefferies & Co. rates Google at "buy," with a price target of $120. Google debuted at $85 per share on Aug. 19 and rose to an intra-day high of $113.48 on Aug. 23.

"Investors will be looking for continued online paid search advertising," said Garrity. It's a rapidly growing field with heavy competition from Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN. So far, Google outstrips them in terms of search-engine popularity. In June, its share of searches among the top 25 engines was 34.5%, compared with Yahoo!'s 29.2% and MSN's 14.1%, according to data from comScore Networks.

Most analysts expect Google to take a hit when more stock becomes available for sale in the coming months. But none would venture an estimate. As with most things Google-related, unpredictability seems to be the only given. 

Italics there are mine because if you were to insert the word "Facebook" in place of Google in those sentences I've italicized above, you too could be a reporter writing about the Facebook IPO instead of the Google IPO.

So back to Facebook - I waited until after Facebook had come public and crashed after its IPO instead of buying it the day it came public. I got lucky in waiting because the stock subsequently fell to where I thought it actually looked cheap -- at $26 a share -- and it has quickly run above $32 a share in the two weeks since.

And today the analysts from Wall Street -- the same guys who were scared of giving an estimate for Google and who were fearful of the unpredictability of Google back when it was 1/6 the price it is now -- have this to say about our Facebook long:

BMO is one of several Wall Street firms releasing investment advice on Facebook's shares. Goldman, RBC and Morgan Stanley are among the firms that have issued optimistic reports, while Barclays, BofA Merrill and Citigroup have offered more subdued takes on the social network. The prevailing sense is it could take Facebook a year more before regaining its IPO price. With a $25 estimate, BMO joins Bernstein as the firms holding the lowest Facebook price targets on the Street, according to FactSet.

Even the bullish analysts describe the fear of the unknowns as the primary reason to worry about the Facebook stock now:

Although Barclays described itself as excited by Facebook's long-term opportunity in online advertising, it pointed to significant risks. "Facebook does not derive any meaningful revenue from its increasing mobile usage, and its ability to do so going forward is unproven," it said.

Merrill Lynch agreed, starting its coverage with a neutral rating, and $38 price target. Facebook is in the midst of a mobile usage transition, the bank added, and thus the bank is cautious on Facebook's revenue trends until new mobile advertising revenue models start driving the top line.

As I wrote the other day when we first started buying Facebook at $26 a share, the same people who are so scared of Facebook's potential to dominate the next phase of the Internet are probably going to love it when the stock is up a bunch and the future more clear to them. In the meantime, I think Facebook is a must-own and it is as large a position for me now as my long-held biggest positions, Google and Apple.


Okay, Cody back in real-time 2017 here.

I thought Snapchat was insane for not taking Facebook's buyout offer a couple years ago for $4 billion. Now I think it's insane that Facebook didn't offer $15 or 20 billion for Snapchat when it had the chance. Snapchat's come a very long way since its early adopters used it as a safer way to sext with each other.

If you haven't used Snapchat, I suggest you at least download it and check it out. My username on there is codylwillard, though I can't say I'm terribly active on any social media these days, from Facebook to Twitter to Snapchat -- I don't post much. Even better is if you know anyone under the age of 25, have them show you how they use Snapchat.

As always, I'm interested to hear the thoughts from Trading With Cody subscribers out there. What are your experiences, thoughts and/or insights on Snapchat?

 

 

 


This article was written by Cody Willard for on Jan 30,2017.

Share this Article

Comments:

Add Image